Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: Project STRIDE
Journal Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: Given that only 25% of Americans meet physical activity recommendations, there is a need to develop and disseminate effective, evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity. The authors tested 2 delivery channels, telephone and print, to determine whether one was more effective in promoting physical activity. DESIGN: The authors randomly assigned 239 healthy, sedentary adults to (a) telephone-based individualized feedback, (b) print-based individualized feedback, or (c) contact control. Both intervention arms were guided by a motivationally tailored, theoretically driven computer expert system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical activity as measured by the 7-day Physical Activity Recall interview. RESULTS: At 6 months, both telephone and print arms significantly increased in minutes of moderate intensity physical activity compared with control, with no differences between the intervention arms. At 12 months, print participants reported a significantly greater number of moderate intensity minutes than both telephone and control participants, who did not differ. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that both telephone and print enhance the adoption of physical activity among sedentary adults; however, print interventions may be particularly effective in maintaining physical activity in the longer term.

  • Link to Article

    publication date

  • 2007
  • published in

  • Health Psychology  Journal
  • Research

    keywords

  • Behavior
  • Health Promotion
  • Motivation
  • Physical Activity
  • Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Telephone
  • Additional Document Info

    volume

  • 26
  • issue

  • 4